I, too, am in favor of the core provisions of HR 1591, but I am extremely concerned over the unrelated added expenditure categories. What was the rationale among the bill's managers for this? I certainly hope there was no "pork" for [our state] in the final version sent to the Senate.
Is there any way, in your opinion, that this kind of "business as usual" can be stopped?
Readers, think about writing your congressperson, too.