Cunning Realist nails it again. When will our-war-prez and our-war-prez-wannabee be able to answer this simple question?
Coincidentally, I am reading The Assassin's Gate: America in Iraq by George Packer. Dubya and straight-talk are excused somewhat since apparently no one has known the answer during the period from March 2003 to the present. Dick cheney has known an answer at various times, but there seems to be no correlation to the facts on the ground.
Showing posts with label junket. Show all posts
Showing posts with label junket. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
Which way to the front?
Labels:
bush,
civil war,
conservatism,
foreign policy,
iraq,
junket,
mccain,
partial truth,
surge,
truth,
war,
withdrawal,
WOT
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Punchy Palookas
Answering growing criticism in the U.S. and Australia, [cheney] defended the Iraq war as a "remarkable achievement" . . .
In oz this week, I suppose he feels no need to tell the truth in the hinterlands, but wait, he feels no need in the u.s.a!
The line on punchy palookas refers to a theme begun on an earlier post here. There is a great scene in Pulp Fiction where travolta calls willis palooka, willis says, who you calling palooka, and travolta says, that's right, punchy, I'm calling you, palooka.
In oz this week, I suppose he feels no need to tell the truth in the hinterlands, but wait, he feels no need in the u.s.a!
The line on punchy palookas refers to a theme begun on an earlier post here. There is a great scene in Pulp Fiction where travolta calls willis palooka, willis says, who you calling palooka, and travolta says, that's right, punchy, I'm calling you, palooka.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)